Tag Archives: civil war

Bits and Pieces – 20170901, Friday

Commentary: As food for thought, consider: Two New Totalitarian Movements: Radical Islam and Political Correctness. The former idea is not new new to readers of this blog but the latter may be. Rather it is a popular manifestation of totalitarian thought and practice in the West.

Civil Unrest: An Intimate History of Antifa. Also others are commenting on the rise of violence in division: The Rising Trend of Civil Unrest and Threats of political violence rise in polarized Trump era. Martin Armstron also comments: Extreme Left & Extreme Right Believe in the Same Thing – Oppress all Opposition. Finally, you won’t hear about this on the CBC: FBI, DHS Officially Classify Antifa Activities As “Domestic Terrorist Violence”.

Martin Armstrong identifies an aspect of the civil war in the US at the political level when he notes that Trump has been under continuous attack since he became president: Trying to Force Trump to Resign.

Bits and Pieces – 20170824, Thursday

Civil Unrest: I like the following article by Gregory R. Copley as it presents some thoughtful ideas on civil war that are thought-provoking: What Would A U.S. Civil War Look Like? We probably use the term “civil war” without any clear understanding of how we hold the idea. The following should provide some clarity.

In this article Copley sees “a gradual breakdown of law and order” that creates “a massive dislocation of the economy and currency” that in turn causes global economic and social disruption. He identifies the rise of  “urban super-oligarchies” and an”urban-based globalism” as one side in the war. He notes the formidable entrenched powers of this side that are destroying the nation-state:

urban globalists control most of the means of communications [is this new “means of production”; the 21st Century marxian dialectic?] and therefore control “information” and the perception of events. 

On the other side are  “nationalists … operating instinctively, and in darkness”.

From this viewpoint, the infighting that has been going on in the White House suddenly falls into perspective: Why Bannon Lost and the Globalists Won. The 2016 election might be considered to be one of the opening battles of this war. As Steve Bannon notes, the nationalists have lost this battle: Bannon: ‘The Trump Presidency That We Fought For, and Won, Is Over. But as he also notes, many more battles remain.

As a second characteristic dividing the sides in the war he sees the polarization of a fundamentally urban, abstract society against a fundamentally regional, traditional society.

a conflict between people with long memories (even if those memories are flawed and selective) and people to whom memories and history are irrelevant.

The former in turn is characterized by zzz. In other words, it is a conflict between identity and materialism, with the abstract social groups (the urban populations) the most preoccupied with short-term material gain.

At the level of the individual, the divide is between individuals with long memories – national identity – and people to whom memories and history are irrelevant. It is a conflict between identity and materialism, with the abstract social groups (the urban populations) the most preoccupied with short-term material gain.

Trump’s “Make America Great Again” is a nationalist ideal that is pitted against the materialism of an urban society that is fed by the low economic costs of industry controlled by globalists. That the Washington Post owned by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is so virulently anti-Trump is no accident.

In short, urban globalism sees nations and nationalism as the enemy, and vice-versa.

As for the violence of Charlottesville: “Fear The Majoritarian Mob” – WSJ On The Left’s “Great Nazi Scare Of 2017”.

Bits and Pieces – 20170820, Sunday

Commentary: Trying to write a weekly blog to reduce publication overhead has not been helpful from the viewpoint of content because things are moving too fast. I’m going to try shorter daily posts.

A theme that I have posted links and comments about in the past is the idea of a new civil war in the US. Pat Buchanan writes from the perspective that the war is actually underway: America’s Second Civil War. I would agree.

The left has been working towards totalitarian government for a century and more. The cases where they have succeeded have resulted in some of the most brutal and repressive regimes in the world. The left, including our modern day progressives in academia and the arts are intolerant of any point of view differing from their own. This is why democracy is anathema to them. A totalitarian state where they have absolute control over the individual is their ideal form of government.

As I publish, this just out: Bannon: “No Administration In History Has Been So Divided”.

The US is very far along this divide and violence will be a common feature going forward. It is already a most uncivil war.

Bits and Pieces – 20170619 – Monday

Civil Unrest: The deepening divides in the US leave one wondering which way it may go … er, blow. Here’s one civil war scenario: The Treasonous Secession Of Climate Confederacy States. Jerry Brown leads a renegade band of states that want to form their own international climate treaties, something forbidden in the constitution.

Then there’s the left/right divide that is becoming increasingly violent: Summer Of Hate: The Arrival Of The Crisis & The Second Civil War? The problem of a civil war based on political orientation is that it is not territorial in the sense that civil wars result in the division of a country. France is probably the model for this kind of civil war.

MSM: Media wars, the other side: Alex Jones Gets Jump On Megyn Kelly – Leaks Recordings “To Set The Record Straight”. Did Megyn’s piece air?

WWIII: Another piece moved into place against Russia ensuring the Russians will have to go nuclear defensively: Norway On The Way To Become Unfriendly Neighbor In Russia’s Eyes. And we have escalation in Syria beginning with the latest coalition attack on a Syrian fighter: Russia Halts Cooperation With US In Syria, Will “Intercept Any Aircraft” In Russian Areas Of Operation. And the response: Pentagon Responds: “US Pilots Will Defend Themselves If Attacked By Russians”. Remember, the generals are now in control.

The American Empire (AE): The AE apparently lost a key supporter: ISIS Leader Baghdadi Reportedly Killed In Russian Airstrike. Damn those Ruskies. Elsewhere on the periphery: US General Wants 20,000 Additional Ground Troops Sent To Afghanistan. Recall that Trump recently gave the military carte blanche: Donald Trump’s hands-off approach gives US military free rein.

Canada Corner: Housing info: Despite Bank Of Canada Hubris, Existing Home Sales Crash In May.

Bits and Pieces: Here’s something to stick in your back pocket: Scientists Warn Current Yellowstone Quake-Swarm “Could Rip The Guts Out Of America”. This event has spawned a sensationalist article: There Have Been 296 Earthquakes In The Vicinity Of The Yellowstone Supervolcano Within The Last 7 Days. This does not mean that much of the article may not be accurate. I recall reading years ago that a past eruption of the Yellowstone super-volcano affected much of the continental US as described.

Escalation in the Middle East: Saudis Foil Iranian Terror Attack On Major Offshore Oil Field. At depressed prices, it might be time to add some oil stocks to one’s portfolio. Also, Israel Has Been Secretly Funding Syrian Rebels For Years.

Bits and Pieces – 20170601 – Thursday

Commentary:I won’t be near my computer until next Tuesday so here are a few items… oh, and our new house:


Civil Unrest: Martin Armstrong looks at the hatred the left have for their opponents: If You Want To Know Why Civil War Is Possible Just Look At This. He particularly singles out the MSM as a source of fake news used to attack Trump as part of the soft coup: Will the Next Revolution Include the Press and Journalists as Part of the Corruption?The Harvard study he refers to I posted the link for a few days ago.

The Deep State: Another view on the soft coup against Trump, this time from Martin Armstrong: The Plot to Overthrow Trump is VERY REAL!!!!!.

WWIII: Here is a short article that looks at the balance between Chinese and American interests in the North Pacific. An interesting point is made how the declining British Empire accommodated the interests of the growing American Empire without going to war How America Could End Up in an Unexpected War with China. And while we’re in the area, this article gives us a bit more information about US naval assets deployed against NK along with some thoughts about American strategic military thinking Short Victorious War: US President’s Magic Wand to Wave in a Pinch. A short victorious war like … lik … Afghanistan, or Iraq, or Vietnam, or …?

The American Empire (AE): Your empire at work: Mattis: US To “Annihilate” Islamic State Caliphate, Civilian Casualties A “Fact Of Life”.

Bits and Pieces: Canada corner: At least Canada leads the world in something: Does America Need A Northern Border Wall?

Can you spot the violence under the surface here: Evergreen State College Chaos Reigns: “Whiteness Is The Most Violent F**king System Ever”? I still wonder how employable these college graduates will be.

Hillary is still trying to figure out why she lost: “I Was The Victim”: Hillary Blames DNC, NYT, “1,000 Russian Agents,” Comey And WikiLeaks For Loss and Hillary Clinton Now Says Trump Aided the Russians. Mirror mirror on the wall … I really think it was penguins.

Bits and Pieces – 20170314, Tuesday

Commentary: Last post I presented the idea that the left actively seeks a totalitarian state. Here’s an article that suggests that we may already be there: Welcome to Totalitarian America, President Trump! This idea might marry the narrative of the Deep State with a number of other narratives: the militarization of police forces; the large scale military exercises conducted in American cities in the last few years; the complete control over personal communications by the various branches of the intelligence community (NSA, CIA); the subjugation of the economic interests of the American people to those of Wall Street; and so on.

I had concluded years ago that democracy by its nature, is a phase in a cycle: democracy -> socialism -> totalitarianism ->  revolution -> democracy. The reason is that democracy allows politicians to promise and provide socialist entitlements in return for being elected and retaining self-rewarding (corruption in the extreme) power. As socialist programs pile up creating a socialist democracy, the cost of the socialist programs eventually reaches the point (we are there now – Ontario’s medical system; massive deficits and debt) where they must collapse with widespread civil unrest. This leads to repressive control of the population and suspension of constitutional and civil rights, and the democratic process. At this point the state has become totalitarian leading to the eventual emergence of resistance which for survival becomes increasingly militant and violent. Eventually revolution results. At this point democracy may seem the best option for the future  (we’ll do it right this time).

As a final note, I have an extensive commentary on money that emerged as I wrote this. It would be worth your while to rea and understand some of the issues around an asset that you think you have control over but don’t.

Bits and Pieces – 20170128, Saturday

Commentary: Forget the left. Their view of Trump is so warped and limited that it is useful for nothing. If you want some real insight into Trump, listen to this 5 minute interview with Newt Gingrich: Newt Gingrich: Trumpism explained,

Civil Unrest: In Bits and Pieces – 20170117, Tuesday I wrote “The really interesting thought I found is that the next civil war has already begun.” Adding further support to this notion on a tip from a friend  is: America’s Second Civil War.

Trump: Trump appears to be setting up a weekly address to the people. Here is the first: President Trump’s First Address To The Nation. Note that he said that he met with the leaders of some of the country’s top manufacturing companies and labour unions. No mention of the world’s top leaders. He is consistent with his priorities.

Bits and Pieces: Here’s an opinion piece analyzing Obama’s term in office: Obama Bequeaths a More Dangerous World. It is partially sympathetic while identifying the forces working around him and against him.

Apparently legislation exists that would undo many of Obama’s executive orders. This is an interesting read: CRA: The “Regulatory Game Changer” That Could Wipe Out 8 Years Of Obama Regs In An Hour.

The leading university in snowflake protection has more to offer: Ohio State Offers Class On How To Detect Microaggressions And Be “Self-Aware Of White Privilege”. Can you imagine what the next generation will be like?

My wife and I were discussing the irony how shopping malls on the outskirts of small town North America hollowed out the downtown cores of the towns. As we walked around our neighbourhood mall today and noted new store closures (month end is approaching and likely the end of leases) adding to a number that have closed months ago. On-line retailing is hollowing out the cores of malls. The big store brands like Sears Holding, Macy’s, J.C. Penny and others are in deep trouble. Several are already in chapter 11 and history. The question to ponder is will Amazon take over the retail world? And while you’re thinking about it, consider this: Amazon Enters Trillion Dollar Ocean Freight Business: How Many Jobs Will Vanish?

Without comment because I can’t think of anything civil: Trudeau, Sturgeon Respond To Refugee Ban: “Welcome To Those Fleeing Persecution, Terror And War”.

Bits and Pieces – 20170117, Tuesday

Commentary: From one of my favourite writers, an interesting piece on what the reactionary forces might do leading up to and into the inauguration: The Cheeto Cometh. The really interesting thought I found is that the next civil war has already begun.

We tend to think of major events as having clear start and stop points such as Pearl Harbor marking the start of WWII for the US. In actual fact, the US at that time had already enacted an oil embargo on Japan which might be said to have required Pearl Harbor as a defensive measure by Japan to the embargo which in turn may be understood as an act of war by the US.

Having said this, I just read a piece by George Friedman and Jacob Shapiro in which they state that their horizon for geopolitical analysis is independent of calendars and as such, specific events: Europe: The Process of Change Continues.

We are linear deterministic thinkers in a world where all action is individually determined and collectively emergent. So there is a continuum in any conflict among the protagonists in which specific points are purely arbitrary. We create such points to enable our (linear) thinking and discourse but in so choosing them, we lose the perspective of the true nature of the conflict. It also ensures our responses will not be optimal and may be very bad.

The conflict among the various political constituencies (I’m not talking Republican/Democrat) has become so polarized that an argument may be made that a civil war is in progress, has been for several generations, but has not yet entered a hot or kinetic phase. This is something to be feared.

I have been including links to speculation on a Trump assassination. It could, however be larger as: Putin Warns Of “Maidan-Style” Attempt To Delegitimize Trump; Doesn’t Believe Trump Used Hookers In Moscow. For those of you not recognizing the reference, “Maidan” refers to the events in the 2014 Ukrainian revolution during which it is alleged that right-wing extremist groups, supported by the State Department and the CIA, violently overthrew the elected government in a coup – classic CIA playbook activity.

Civil War Has Begun in the Heartland Of Islam Part One: The Shia/Sunni Feud.

We consider this essay by Paul Merkley, reprinted by permission of Paul and from The Bayview Review, to be a particularly important one. Should this centuries-old battle end in either a victory for one side or some kind of union, then the full force of Islam can be unleashed against the infidels. That is you. See the links at the end for direct access to the rest of Paul’s work.

The Irrelevance of the “Pursuit of Happiness” in Islamic Politics.
So far, the interminable Arab Spring has accomplished nothing towards making the lives of ordinary people more secure against tyranny, more prosperous or more stable – in a word “happier.” Indeed, it should be clear to all by now that “happiness” as we understand it is not on the program.

It will sound like high treason against everything that the politically correct allow us to say out loud, but the fact is that the last time when public life was stable enough in the Middle East to provide the minimum conditions for the achievement of “happiness” in private life was when the entire region was ruled by European Empires or by Mandates, held under the League of Nations. It has all been downhill since the imperial masters yielded independence to the many “nations” that now figure on our maps of the Middle East – a process that began in the early 1940s.

Flash Point: Civil War Breaks Out in Europe!

Have we joined the yellow press to gain readership? No but maybe we got your attention. However, we do see the potential for civil war within the EU. Consider a few things.

Last November we posted an article: The Future of Europe. It was a commentary on the proposal of for the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) which as we noted was:

In short, an unelected and nonrepresentational body, which with its officials would be completely above any law, would have an unlimited claim on the finances of a member country.

We also captured a some remarks of Angel Merkel’s:

  1. Nobody should take for granted another 50 years of peace and prosperity in Europe … that’s why I say: If the euro fails, Europe fails.
  2. We have a historical obligation: To protect by all means Europe’s unification process begun by our forefathers after centuries of hatred and blood spill. None of us can foresee what the consequences would be if we were to fail.

At the time we wondered if this was a veiled threat to use force on member countries to keep them in the union and subjugated to the dictates of an increasingly powerful and comprehensive European Union. For recent coverage listen to the KWN interview of Sept. 25 with Nigel Farage.

There is increasingly a move towards centralized fiscal control of EU members by an entire process of undemocratic advances in EU power. The enslavement mechanism is to force EU members to require and request EU bailout support at the cost of national fiscal independence. The nature of the bailout process is that it does not remove the debt burden of countries but perpetuates it at the cost of national and democratic control.

Greece and Spain in particular are in such desperate economic straits that they may face internal revolution. That is the point that we expect to see a pan-European paramilitary force intervene. What happens if the military seizes control in Greece as they have an historical tendency to do? Will they be pro or anti-EU and if the latter, will war ensue?

We think there is the possibility as the centralized control of nations progresses that there will be popular revolts leading to civil war. Will we see A second Spanish Civil War? How will NATO and particularly the North American members respond? AS we said, a possibility

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: photography charlottesville va | Thanks to ppc software, penny auction and larry goins